Friday, June 12, 2015

The Collyer Brothers

Here's a post that seems like it comes a little out of left field. Truth be told, it's actually about one of my main interests that I've diligently researched on my own time for a couple of years now. With this blog about the darker side of humanity, I'm excited to be able to formulate my own informational post about the Collyer Brothers.

Homer and Langley Collyer were not evil people akin to the other people I've mentioned on this blog thus far. They were just two brothers who lived in New York in the 1940s.
Raised wealthy, the brothers lived a comfortable life in a Manhattan row house with their mother and father. Late into their childhood, their father and mother split up. Their father moved into an apartment nearby. The mother and brothers lived in a Harlem brownstone. The brothers, who never married, chose to stay with their mother.

Homer and Langley attended Columbia University, where Homer obtained a degree in admiralty law and Langley studied engineering and chemistry. Homer worked as a lawyer while Langley dealt pianos.
When their father died, he left the brothers all of his possessions and wealth. Soon after, their mother died, leaving the brothers the Harlem brownstone that the three of them had lived in.

After their parents died, life took a turn for the worse for the brothers. Homer suffered hemorrhages in the backs of both of his eyes, leaving him blind. Langley quit his job to become a full-time caretaker for his brother. In doing this, the two brothers began to withdraw more and more from society.
Their withdrawal from society was soon noticed by the public, and crowds would gather outside their brownstone. Teenagers would begin to throw rocks at the windows, so Langley boarded them up, furthering the brother's shut in.

Langley was enamored with inventions. The house was littered with them. He would also walk for miles each day to find stale bread and newspapers, which would eventually become stacked throughout the house.
To try and cure Homer, he fed him a hundred oranges a week, black bread, and peanut butter. Langley was convinced that this regimen, along with permanent bed rest, would cure Homer's blindness.

Meanwhile, the brownstone was falling into a state of disarray. Langley would bring home various pieces of junk that began to fill the house. Cleaning crews came to the house and they managed to clear a small area before Langley stormed in, asked them what they wanted, wrote a check, and sent everyone on their way.
Their heat, electricity, and gas were turned off. Langley left only after midnight and only to scavenge food, collect items, and file complaints against people disrupting their peace. No one had seen Homer in years. Langley was fiercely protective, and never let anyone who came to the house see him.

Later, a caller who used the name "Charles Smith" called the police to report a dead body in the Collyer house. It took the police a full day to gain access into the home, and another five hours of digging in trash until they found Homer's body. He was sitting on a bed, alone, dead from starvation and dehydration.
The process was especially difficult for the police because to evade intruders, Langley had constructed a number of traps and tunnels that only he knew the way through in all the trash.

Now the search for Langley was on. There was no sign of him in the house. No one could find him for days. The police searched all over town for three days. Finally they found a mummified Langley, crushed under mountains of trash from own of his own boobytraps. In his hand was a food tray meant for Homer.

What happened was this: Langley was Homer's only source of nutrition. Homer could not move from the bed, because he was blind and did not know Langley's intricate tunnel system. When Langley was killed, Homer died soon after from lack of care.

The brownstone was torn down and in it's place now, stands a pocket park in the brother's honour.

For more details on the Collyer brother's lives, click this link. Image credits also go to this link.

(The interior of the Collyer brownstone)
(The Collyer brother's park, in place of the brownstone)





Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Serial killers

Flip on your TV. Click on a sassy satire/ironic news article site, like Cracked or Buzzfeed. Peruse the links on the side of your online news source for a bit. Guarantee you, you'll find some sort of "6 Most Dangerous Serial Killers Humanity Has Ever Known" before too long.
Or maybe those are just the sort of articles I like to read?

Regardless, serial killers are simultaneously a silenced topic and a macabre conversation topic for many people. A very taboo topic, and for good reason. Humans, just like you and I, compelled to murder multiple people in a serial fashion.

It's interesting how many documentaries circle around the lives and misdoings of serial killers. So many of them also delve into why serial killers commit the crimes that they do. A lot of the back story seems to be tied to the perpetrator's upbringing and past.
To speak more to that, it seems as though most serial killers are white men. A common theme tying these criminal men together is that they do not deal well with rejection. There are countless cases of men killers killing because women turned them down.

I believe this is no coincidence. White cis gender men are used to a life of systematic privilege. When they are denied something from women (the seeming "lesser" sex), they respond with aggression and violence.

To take a look at some physical evidence, have a scroll down this page of Infamous Serial Killers. The number of men alone is staggering compared to others featured there. 

Image credits: http://listabuzz.com/serial-killers/

(Fictitious serial killer from the movie American Psycho, Patrick Bateman)  
(Fictitious serial killer from the movie Silence Of The Lambs, Hannibal Lecter)




Tuesday, June 9, 2015

Modern horror vs. classic horror

A hot-button big-topic point of debate with horror media fans is classic horror versus modern horror. Bringing this issue up in a forum or room inhabited by die-hard horror movie goers will be sure to ignite a flame war. Classic horror's fans will be sure to bring up the original ideas and cheesy but golden special effects, while those who stand with modern horror are quick to pronounce the franchise's incredible visual effects and intricate plots.

Myself, I'm stuck in the middle. There's no way I'm going to be able to deny the genius of classic horror flicks like Psycho and Dracula. Because the horror franchise was so new back then, new ideas of what could get people scared were abundant, if somewhat gimmick-y. With the absence of computerized visual effects, filmmakers used only their cameras and what they could do in front of the screen. This era is when special effects (effects and gimmicks done in real time, in front of the camera. These include make-up, explosions, lights and fog.) really came into their own. For proof of incredibly scary but super old films, check this link of some compiled classic films.

I'm also a huge advocate (and can get myself pretty heated on the subject of) modern horror media. I love the films that the modern horror industry have been churning out lately. Though I must say in the recent years (5-ish years) I've been looking at a lull in the horror flicks that have come out.
Nevertheless, I'm a fan of modern horror's intricate plots and on-screen shocks and thrills. Take Insidious 1 and 2. I consider these films (as a duo) to be the best horror films that have come out in the last 20 years.
I say this because the plot is thought out and well executed (a feat that many modern horror films are lacking), the visual and special effects are not in-your-face but subtle and inclusive. Insidious 1 and 2 also employs a lot of what makes classic films great- an impressive and haunting soundtrack, smooth editing, and the simple use of on-screen lights and fog.

Both franchises (though they are technically the same thing, I do see them as separate franchises) have significant differences- positives and negatives. I enjoy the franchises as two separate things instead of picking one over the other. Doing this, I'm able to be satisfied completely as a horror movie lover.
Image credits: http://www.fanpop.com/clubs/horror-movies/quiz/show/83412/which-popular-classic-horror-film-image-from & http://www.moviesonline.ca/2010/10/top-5-modern-horror-icons/


Friday, June 5, 2015

Living humans love the dead ones

Humans love to enjoy and consume media of fabricated media horror. Fake "movie magic" horror is often a very real thrill for us.
Similar to our love for stimulated horror is our love for real threats. We consume cases and newspaper articles and documentaries and more about serial killers, medical mysteries, murderers and kidnappers and all forms of human evil.

You know what else we find interesting? Not just fake humanity horror, or real humanity horror...but the dead.

Victims? To murder? To illness? Natural causes? With our fascination with the dead, it lies more with how old the dead in question are, and how their bodies are preserved.

Mummies.

They're a popular comedic trope, especially in the form of linen-clad figures chasing a gang of teenagers around a haunted house set to upbeat music. They give us an incredible scientific insight into the lives of humans who have lived before us. And of course, they creep us out.

Some of the more interesting and well researched mummies are the ones that look almost as if they could still be alive. One of my personal favorites (favorite mummy?) is the 500+ year old Incan Ice Maiden. Found in Argentina on the volcano

Llullaillaco with two other mummified children, she's almost perfectly preserved by the frigid temperatures of the mountainous landscape. To look at her you would think she may be asleep. Her hair still has lice in it and her lungs still have an infection lingering. To learn more about the Incan Ice Maiden, click this link.

Mummies are fascinating perspectives on human's natural fear of death. Leaving our flesh vessel, i.e, dying, scares us. The debate on whether our essence is separate from our body is ongoing, and may never be solved. Mummies are a very real representation of death and the passing of live, so perhaps that s why we are so fascinated by them.

(Image credits: http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/418736/Amazing-tale-of-the-Inca-ice-maiden-a-human-sacrifice-left-to-die-500-years-ago & http://www.how-to-draw-cartoons-online.com/cartoon-mummy.html)

(The Incan Ice Maiden)








Tuesday, May 19, 2015

An introductory post

Horror has been part of humanity's existence since the very beginning. When humans lived in caves and speared their dinner on sharpened wooden sticks, horror was real and primal. Horror was the predators that hunted you, horror was the mysterious illnesses that took your loved ones from you in the dead of night. Fear was a constant, there was no need to go looking for more sources.

Why now do humans seek horror out? Why do we flock to theaters showing the latest in blood-and-gore with our tickets clutched in our hands? Why is there a whole varying culture of horror media, and what defines good horror? Here's a link explaining why, scientifically, humans enjoy horror the way that we do, 
But is it all just science?
We seek the thrill, we seek the adrenaline, we seek the shock value, but some run from it with their eyes covered. Why do some willingly shell their over their money to be scared in their theater seats and others you couldn't pay enough to watch a horror movie?

Moreover, what is this society's fascination with the real macabre? Why do we watch documentaries about serial killers, read articles about ancient mummies, follow criminal cases closely? Even if the threat is real, humans will stake it out, study it, obsess over it.

This is what I want to delve more into through this blog. Through delving more into specific movies, specific cases, and other files from the dark and unknown, I want to explore more what ties the modern human's brain with things that scare us.
Image citations: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death & www.scarygirl.com.